78

Points
Unisoc Tiger T700
Overview - Tiger T700 Vs Dimensity 7025

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Tiger T700 vs Dimensity 7025 SoCs by Unisoc and Mediatek respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Tiger T700 14
Dimensity 7025 33
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Tiger T700 9
Dimensity 7025 21
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Tiger T700 57
Dimensity 7025 79
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Tiger T700 27
Dimensity 7025 44
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Tiger T700 Dimensity 7025
CPU 67140 163789
GPU 43026 78876
Memory 44785 118764
UX 58416 135743
Total score 213367 497172
Key Differences

Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 7025

  • Dimensity 7025 has 37.36% higher CPU clock speed than Tiger T700 (2500 vs 1820 MHz).
  • Dimensity 7025 has 11.76% higher GPU clock speed than Tiger T700 (950 vs 850 MHz).
  • Dimensity 7025 has 71.49% higher memory frequency than Tiger T700 (3200 vs 1866 MHz).
  • Dimensity 7025 has 50% smaller sized transistor than Tiger T700 (6 vs 12 nm).
  • Dimensity 7025 has 133.01% better AnTuTu 9 score than Tiger T700 (497 K vs 213 K ).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Tiger T700 355
Dimensity 7025 1028

Multi-Core Score

icon
Tiger T700 1349
Dimensity 7025 2430

Image compression

icon
Tiger T700 83.2
Dimensity 7025

Face detection

icon
Tiger T700 9.85
Dimensity 7025

Speech recognition

icon
Tiger T700 23.9
Dimensity 7025

Machine learning

icon
Tiger T700 18.5
Dimensity 7025

Camera shooting

icon
Tiger T700 9.6
Dimensity 7025

HTML 5

icon
Tiger T700 1.37
Dimensity 7025

SQLite

icon
Tiger T700 421.8
Dimensity 7025

3DMark

Stability %

Graphics test -
Stability %

Graphics test -
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display Full HD+ @ 90Hz Full HD+ @120Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2160 x 1080 2520 x 1080
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR - HDR10+
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

48%
Turbo Clock Speed

1820 MHz

66%
Turbo Clock Speed

2500 MHz

83%
Base Frequency

1820 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

  • Architecture 2x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A75
    6x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A55
    2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A78
    6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - -
  • L3 cache - -
  • Process 12 nm 6 nm
  • Transistor count - 10 Billion
  • TDP - -
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G52 MC2 IMG BXM-8-256
  • Architecture Bifrost 2 PowerVR IMG GPU
  • GPU frequency 850 MHz 950 MHz
  • Execution units 2 8
  • Shading units 32 18
  • FLOPS 54.4 Gigaflops -
  • Vulkan version 1.0 1.3
  • OpenCL version 2.0 3.0
  • DirectX version 11 -
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 1866 MHz 3200 MHz
  • Max bandwidth - 51.2 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 6 GB 16 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR5
  • Bus 2x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Yes Yes
  • Storage type eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1 UFS 2.2, UFS 3.1
  • Max display resolution 2160 x 1080 2520 x 1080
  • Max camera resolution 1x 48MP, 2x 16MP 1x 200MP
  • Video capture 1K at 30FPS 2K at 30FPS
  • Video playback 1080p at 30FPS 2K at 30FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem LTE Cat. 7 -
  • 4G support No LTE Cat. 18
  • 5G support - Yes
  • Wi-Fi 5 5
  • Bluetooth 5.0 5.2
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Unisoc Tiger T700

CPU
14%
GPU
9%
Memory
22%
Energy efficiency and battery life
57%

MediaTek Dimensity 7025

CPU
33%
GPU
21%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
79%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote