78

Points
Unisoc Tiger T700

78

Points
Apple A17 Pro
Overview - Tiger T700 Vs A17 Pro

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Tiger T700 vs A17 Pro SoCs by Unisoc and Apple respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core and 6-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Tiger T700 14
A17 Pro 94
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Tiger T700 9
A17 Pro 97
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Tiger T700 57
A17 Pro 89
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Tiger T700 27
A17 Pro 93
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Tiger T700 A17 Pro
CPU 67140 399992
GPU 43026 620081
Memory 44785 265579
UX 58416 346005
Total score 213367 1631657
AnTuTu results from iOS and Android are not directly comparable! They won't affect Tenzys Tech scores.
Key Differences

Pros of Apple A17 Pro

  • A17 Pro has 107.69% higher CPU clock speed than Tiger T700 (3780 vs 1820 MHz).
  • A17 Pro has 64.47% higher GPU clock speed than Tiger T700 (1398 vs 850 MHz).
  • A17 Pro has 71.49% higher memory frequency than Tiger T700 (3200 vs 1866 MHz).
  • A17 Pro has 75% smaller sized transistor than Tiger T700 (3 vs 12 nm).
  • A17 Pro has 664.72% better AnTuTu 9 score than Tiger T700 (1,632 K vs 213 K ).
  • A17 Pro has latest instruction set, hence better than Tiger T700.
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Tiger T700 355
A17 Pro 2999

Multi-Core Score

icon
Tiger T700 1349
A17 Pro 7779

Image compression

icon
Tiger T700 83.2
A17 Pro

Face detection

icon
Tiger T700 9.85
A17 Pro

Speech recognition

icon
Tiger T700 23.9
A17 Pro

Machine learning

icon
Tiger T700 18.5
A17 Pro

Camera shooting

icon
Tiger T700 9.6
A17 Pro

HTML 5

icon
Tiger T700 1.37
A17 Pro

SQLite

icon
Tiger T700 421.8
A17 Pro

3DMark

Stability %

Graphics test -
Stability 79%

Graphics test 60 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display Full HD+ @ 90Hz -
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2160 x 1080 -
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR - -
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

48%
Turbo Clock Speed

1820 MHz

100%
Turbo Clock Speed

3780 MHz

83%
Base Frequency

1820 MHz

92%
Base Frequency

2020 MHz

  • Architecture 2x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A75
    6x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A55
    2x 3.78 GHz
    4x 2.02 GHz
  • Cores 8 6
  • Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv9-A
  • L1 cache - 256 KB
  • L2 cache - 16 MB
  • L3 cache - -
  • Process 12 nm 3 nm
  • Transistor count - 19 Billion
  • TDP - 8 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G52 MC2 Apple A17 GPU
  • Architecture Bifrost 2 Apple GPU
  • GPU frequency 850 MHz 1398 MHz
  • Execution units 2 6
  • Shading units 32 128
  • FLOPS 54.4 Gigaflops 2147.2 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.0 -
  • OpenCL version 2.0 -
  • DirectX version 11 -
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 1866 MHz 3200 MHz
  • Max bandwidth - 51.2 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 6 GB 8 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR5
  • Bus 2x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Yes Neural Engine
  • Storage type eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1 NVMe
  • Max display resolution 2160 x 1080
  • Max camera resolution 1x 48MP, 2x 16MP
  • Video capture 1K at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video playback 1080p at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9, Motion JPEG
  • Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem LTE Cat. 7 -
  • 4G support No -
  • 5G support - Yes
  • Wi-Fi 5 6
  • Bluetooth 5.0 5.3
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Unisoc Tiger T700

CPU
14%
GPU
9%
Memory
22%
Energy efficiency and battery life
57%

Apple A17 Pro

CPU
94%
GPU
97%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
89%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote