78

Points
Mediatek Helio G99

78

Points
HiSilicon Kirin 9010
Overview - Helio G99 Vs Kirin 9010

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Helio G99 vs Kirin 9010 SoCs by Mediatek and respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core and 12-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Helio G99 20
Kirin 9010 55
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Helio G99 15
Kirin 9010 38
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Helio G99 79
Kirin 9010 100
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Helio G99 38
Kirin 9010 64
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Helio G99 Kirin 9010
CPU 103357 305156
GPU 86376 197179
Memory 89007 266091
UX 101683 201408
Total score 380423 969834
Key Differences

Pros of Mediatek Helio G99

  • Helio G99 has 33.33% higher GPU clock speed than Kirin 9010 (1000 vs 750 MHz).
  • Helio G99 has 55.13% higher memory frequency than Kirin 9010 (4266 vs 2750 MHz).
  • Helio G99 has latest instruction set, hence better than Kirin 9010.

Pros of HiSilicon Kirin 9010

  • Kirin 9010 has 4.55% higher CPU clock speed than Helio G99 (2300 vs 2200 MHz).
  • Kirin 9010 has 154.94% better AnTuTu 9 score than Helio G99 (970 K vs 380 K ).
  • Kirin 9010 Support 157.31% higher memory bandwidth than Helio G99 (44 vs 17.1 GB/s).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Helio G99 543
Kirin 9010 1442

Multi-Core Score

icon
Helio G99 1740
Kirin 9010 4471

Image compression

icon
Helio G99 114.8
Kirin 9010

Face detection

icon
Helio G99 14.3
Kirin 9010

Speech recognition

icon
Helio G99 36.1
Kirin 9010

Machine learning

icon
Helio G99 30.2
Kirin 9010

Camera shooting

icon
Helio G99 16.4
Kirin 9010

HTML 5

icon
Helio G99 1.73
Kirin 9010

SQLite

icon
Helio G99 599.6
Kirin 9010

3DMark

Stability 99%

Graphics test 8 FPS
Stability %

Graphics test -
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display Full HD+ @120 Hz -
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2520 x 1080 -
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR - -
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

58%
Turbo Clock Speed

2200 MHz

61%
Turbo Clock Speed

2300 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

70%
Base Frequency

1550 MHz

  • Architecture 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76
    6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
    2x 2.3 GHz – TaiShan V121
    4x 1.55 GHz – TaiShan V121
    6x 2.18 GHz – Cortex-A510
  • Cores 8 12
  • Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - -
  • L3 cache - -
  • Process 6 nm -
  • Transistor count - 7 Billion
  • TDP - -
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G57 MC2 Maleoon 910
  • Architecture Valhall Maleoon
  • GPU frequency 1000 MHz 750 MHz
  • Execution units 2 -
  • Shading units 32 -
  • FLOPS - -
  • Vulkan version 1.1 -
  • OpenCL version 2.0 -
  • DirectX version 12 -
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 4266 MHz 2750 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 17.1 Gbit/s 44 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 10 GB 16 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR5
  • Bus 2x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Yes Da Vinci
  • Storage type UFS 2.2 UFS 3.1, UFS 4.0
  • Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 3840 x 2160
  • Max camera resolution 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP
  • Video capture 2K at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video playback 2K at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - Balong 5000
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 13 LTE Cat. 24
  • 5G support No Yes
  • Wi-Fi 5 6
  • Bluetooth 5.2 5.2
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Mediatek Helio G99

CPU
20%
GPU
15%
Memory
50%
Energy efficiency and battery life
79%

HiSilicon Kirin 9010

CPU
55%
GPU
38%
Memory
32%
Energy efficiency and battery life
100%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote