78

Points
Mediatek Helio G95

78

Points
Samsung Exynos 2400
Overview - Helio G95 Vs Exynos 2400

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Helio G95 vs Exynos 2400 SoCs by Mediatek and Samsung respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core and 10-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Helio G95 19
Exynos 2400 88
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Helio G95 14
Exynos 2400 76
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Helio G95 57
Exynos 2400 86
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Helio G95 30
Exynos 2400 83
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Helio G95 Exynos 2400
CPU 91718 510545
GPU 91234 587630
Memory 58340 322132
UX 59442 260123
Total score 300734 1680430
Key Differences

Pros of Samsung Exynos 2400

  • Exynos 2400 has 56.59% higher CPU clock speed than Helio G95 (3210 vs 2050 MHz).
  • Exynos 2400 has 12.11% higher GPU clock speed than Helio G95 (1009 vs 900 MHz).
  • Exynos 2400 has 96.91% higher memory frequency than Helio G95 (4200 vs 2133 MHz).
  • Exynos 2400 has 66.67% smaller sized transistor than Helio G95 (4 vs 12 nm).
  • Exynos 2400 has 458.78% better AnTuTu 9 score than Helio G95 (1,680 K vs 301 K ).
  • Exynos 2400 has latest instruction set, hence better than Helio G95.
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Helio G95 529
Exynos 2400 2193

Multi-Core Score

icon
Helio G95 1680
Exynos 2400 6895

Image compression

icon
Helio G95 96.2
Exynos 2400

Face detection

icon
Helio G95 14.6
Exynos 2400

Speech recognition

icon
Helio G95 31.1
Exynos 2400

Machine learning

icon
Helio G95 26.4
Exynos 2400

Camera shooting

icon
Helio G95 13.8
Exynos 2400

HTML 5

icon
Helio G95 1.97
Exynos 2400

SQLite

icon
Helio G95 444.9
Exynos 2400

3DMark

Stability 98%

Graphics test 8 FPS
Stability %

Graphics test -
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display Full HD+ @ 90Hz -
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2520 x 1080 -
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR HDR10+ -
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

54%
Turbo Clock Speed

2050 MHz

85%
Turbo Clock Speed

3210 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

  • Architecture 2x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A76
    6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
    1x 3.21 GHz – Cortex-X4
    2x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
    3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
    4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A520
  • Cores 8 10
  • Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv9.2-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - -
  • L3 cache - -
  • Process 12 nm 4 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP 5 W -
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G76 3EEMC4 Samsung Xclipse 940
  • Architecture Bifrost Samsung Xclipse
  • GPU frequency 900 MHz 1009 MHz
  • Execution units 4 -
  • Shading units 64 -
  • FLOPS 195.8 Gigaflops -
  • Vulkan version 1.1 -
  • OpenCL version 2.0 -
  • DirectX version 12 -
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 2133 MHz 4200 MHz
  • Max bandwidth - -
  • Max Size 10 GB 24 GB
  • Memory type LPDDRLPDDR4X LPDDR5X
  • Bus 2x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Da Vinci Yes
  • Storage type eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1 UFS 4.0
  • Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 3840 x 2400
  • Max camera resolution 1x 64MP, 2x 24MP 1x 320MP
  • Video capture 4K at 30FPS 8K at 60FPS
  • Video playback 4K at 30FPS 8K at 60FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP9 H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - Exynos 5300
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 12 LTE Cat. 24
  • 5G support No Yes
  • Wi-Fi 5 7
  • Bluetooth 5.0 5.4
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Mediatek Helio G95

CPU
19%
GPU
14%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
57%

Samsung Exynos 2400

CPU
88%
GPU
76%
Memory
49%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote