Overview - Dimensity 9300 Vs Dimensity 8300

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Dimensity 9300 vs Dimensity 8300 SoCs by Mediatek. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Dimensity 9300 92
Dimensity 8300 57
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Dimensity 9300 95
Dimensity 8300 58
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Dimensity 9300 86
Dimensity 8300 86
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Dimensity 9300 91
Dimensity 8300 67
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Dimensity 9300 Dimensity 8300
CPU 485064 282796
GPU 899463 542690
Memory 357691 328720
UX 312866 249840
Total score 2055084 1404046
Key Differences

Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 9300

  • Dimensity 9300 has 12.52% higher memory frequency than Dimensity 8300 (4800 vs 4266 MHz).
  • Dimensity 9300 has 46.37% better AnTuTu 9 score than Dimensity 8300 (2,055 K vs 1,404 K).
  • Dimensity 9300 has latest instruction set, hence better than Dimensity 8300.
  • Dimensity 9300 Support 12.61% higher memory bandwidth than Dimensity 8300 (76.8 vs 68.2 MHz).

Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 8300

  • Dimensity 8300 has 3.08% higher CPU clock speed than Dimensity 9300 (3350 vs 3250 MHz).
  • Dimensity 8300 has 7.69% higher GPU clock speed than Dimensity 9300 (1400 vs 1300 MHz).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 9300 2265
Dimensity 8300 1512

Multi-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 9300 7995
Dimensity 8300 4886

3DMark

Stability %

Graphics test 116 FPS
Stability %

Graphics test -
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display 4k@120Hz, WQHD@180Hz WQHD+ @ 120Hz, FHD+ @ 180Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2960 x 1440 2960 x 1440
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR Yes -
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

86%
Turbo Clock Speed

3250 MHz

89%
Turbo Clock Speed

3350 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

100%
Base Frequency

2200 MHz

  • Architecture 1x 3.25 GHz – Cortex-X4
    3x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-X4
    4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A720
    1x 3.35 GHz – Cortex-A715
    3x 3.2 GHz – Cortex-A715
    4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A510
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv9.2-A ARMv9-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - -
  • L3 cache 18 MB 4 MB
  • Process 4 nm 4 nm
  • Transistor count 22.7 Billion -
  • TDP - -
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G720 Immortalis MP12 Mali-G615 MP6
  • Architecture Valhall 5th gen Valhall 4rd gen
  • GPU frequency 1300 MHz 1400 MHz
  • Execution units 12 6
  • Shading units 192 -
  • FLOPS 5990.4 Gigaflops -
  • Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version - -
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 4800 MHz 4266 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 76.8 Gbit/s 68.2 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 24 GB 24 GB
  • Memory type LPDDRLPDDR5T LPDDR5X
  • Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU 790 MediaTek APU 780
  • Storage type UFS 4.0 UFS 4.0
  • Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 2960 x 1440
  • Max camera resolution 1x 320MP 1x 320MP
  • Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video playback 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 24 -
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • Wi-Fi 7 6
  • Bluetooth 5.4 5.4
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

MediaTek Dimensity 9300

CPU
92%
GPU
95%
Memory
56%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%

MediaTek Dimensity 8300

CPU
57%
GPU
58%
Memory
50%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote