Menu

78

Points
Mediatek Dimensity 9000 Plus

Dimensity 9000 Plus

78

Points
MediaTek Dimensity 8300

Dimensity 8300
Overview - Dimensity 9000 Plus Vs Dimensity 8300

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Dimensity 9000 Plus vs Dimensity 8300 SoCs by Mediatek. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Dimensity 9000 Plus 53
Dimensity 8300 57
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Dimensity 9000 Plus 50
Dimensity 8300 58
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Dimensity 9000 Plus 86
Dimensity 8300 86
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Dimensity 9000 Plus 63
Dimensity 8300 67
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Dimensity 9000 Plus Dimensity 8300
CPU 291317 282796
GPU 430867 542690
Memory 218270 328720
UX 206140 249840
Total score 1146594 1404046
Key Differences

Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 8300

  • Dimensity 8300 has 4.69% higher CPU clock speed than Dimensity 9000 Plus (3350 vs 3200 MHz).
  • Dimensity 8300 has 13.76% higher memory frequency than Dimensity 9000 Plus (4266 vs 3750 MHz).
  • Dimensity 8300 has 22.45% better AnTuTu 9 score than Dimensity 9000 Plus (1,404 K vs 1,147 K ).
  • Dimensity 8300 Support 13.67% higher memory bandwidth than Dimensity 9000 Plus (68.2 vs 60 GB/s).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 9000 Plus 1349
Dimensity 8300 1512

Multi-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 9000 Plus 4342
Dimensity 8300 4886

3DMark

44%
Dimensity 9000 Plus
Stability 86%

Graphics test 51 FPS
N/A
Dimensity 8300
Stability %

Graphics test -
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display FHD+ @ 180Hz, WQHD+ @ 144Hz WQHD+ @ 120Hz, FHD+ @ 180Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2960 x 1440 2960 x 1440
  • Max External Display 2K @ 144 Hz -
  • HDR HDR10+ Adaptive -
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

85%
Turbo Clock Speed

3200 MHz

89%
Turbo Clock Speed

3350 MHz

82%
Base Frequency

1800 MHz

100%
Base Frequency

2200 MHz

  • Architecture 1x 3.2 GHz – Cortex-X2
    3x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-A710
    4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A510
     1x 3.35 GHz – Cortex-A715
    3x 3.2 GHz – Cortex-A715
    4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A510
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv9-A ARMv9-A
  • L1 cache 1024 KB -
  • L2 cache 3.5 MB -
  • L3 cache 8 MB 4 MB
  • Process 4 nm 4 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP 4 W -
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G710 MC10 Mali-G615 MP6
  • Architecture Valhall 3 Valhall 4rd gen
  • GPU frequency - 1400 MHz
  • Execution units 10 6
  • Shading units 512 -
  • FLOPS - -
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.3
  • OpenCL version 2 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 -
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 3750 MHz 4266 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 60 Gbit/s 68.2 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 24 GB 24 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR5x LPDDR5X
  • Bus 4x16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Yes MediaTek APU 780
  • Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 4.0
  • Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 2960 x 1440
  • Max camera resolution 1x 320MP, 3x 32MP 1x 320MP
  • Video capture 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video playback 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 24 -
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • Wi-Fi 6 6
  • Bluetooth 5.3 5.4
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Mediatek Dimensity 9000 Plus

Mediatek Dimensity 9000 Plus
CPU
53%
GPU
50%
Memory
44%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%

MediaTek Dimensity 8300

MediaTek Dimensity 8300
CPU
57%
GPU
58%
Memory
50%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote