Overview - Dimensity 9000 Plus Vs Dimensity 6080

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Dimensity 9000 Plus vs Dimensity 6080 SoCs by Mediatek. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Dimensity 9000 Plus 53
Dimensity 6080 27
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Dimensity 9000 Plus 50
Dimensity 6080 17
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Dimensity 9000 Plus 86
Dimensity 6080 79
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Dimensity 9000 Plus 63
Dimensity 6080 41
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Dimensity 9000 Plus Dimensity 6080
CPU 291317 135946
GPU 430867 69519
Memory 218270 103763
UX 206140 121897
Total score 1146594 431125
Key Differences

Pros of Mediatek Dimensity 9000 Plus

  • Dimensity 9000 Plus has 33.33% higher CPU clock speed than Dimensity 6080 (3200 vs 2400 MHz).
  • Dimensity 9000 Plus has 75.81% higher memory frequency than Dimensity 6080 (3750 vs 2133 MHz).
  • Dimensity 9000 Plus has 33.33% smaller sized transistor than Dimensity 6080 (4 vs 6 nm).
  • Dimensity 9000 Plus has 165.95% better AnTuTu 9 score than Dimensity 6080 (1,147 K vs 431 K).
  • Dimensity 9000 Plus has latest instruction set, hence better than Dimensity 6080.
  • Dimensity 9000 Plus Support 251.49% higher memory bandwidth than Dimensity 6080 (60 vs 17.07 MHz).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 9000 Plus 1349
Dimensity 6080 778

Multi-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 9000 Plus 4342
Dimensity 6080 2075

3DMark

Stability 86%

Graphics test 51 FPS
Stability %

Graphics test -
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display FHD+ @ 180Hz, WQHD+ @ 144Hz FHD+ @ 120 Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2960 x 1440 2520 x 1080
  • Max External Display 2K @ 144 Hz -
  • HDR HDR10+ Adaptive -
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

85%
Turbo Clock Speed

3200 MHz

63%
Turbo Clock Speed

2400 MHz

82%
Base Frequency

1800 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

  • Architecture 1x 3.2 GHz – Cortex-X2
    3x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-A710
    4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A510
    2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76
    6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv9-A ARMv8.2-A
  • L1 cache 1024 KB 512 KB
  • L2 cache 3.5 MB 1 MB
  • L3 cache 8 MB 2 MB
  • Process 4 nm 6 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP 4 W 6 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G710 MC10 Mali-G57 MC2
  • Architecture Valhall 3 Valhall 1st gen
  • GPU frequency - 950 MHz
  • Execution units 10 2
  • Shading units 512 64
  • FLOPS - 243.2 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.3
  • OpenCL version 2 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 -
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 3750 MHz 2133 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 60 Gbit/s 17.07 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 24 GB 16 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR5x LPDDR4X
  • Bus 4x16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Yes Yes
  • Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 2.2
  • Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 2520 x 1080
  • Max camera resolution 1x 320MP, 3x 32MP 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP
  • Video capture 4K at 60FPS 2K at 30FPS
  • Video playback 4K at 60FPS 2K at 30FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 18
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • Wi-Fi 6 5
  • Bluetooth 5.3 5.1
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Mediatek Dimensity 9000 Plus

CPU
53%
GPU
50%
Memory
44%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%

MediaTek Dimensity 6080

CPU
27%
GPU
17%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
79%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote